Reporting archive
Evidence on AI and work
Reporting archive

The White House just placed a four-page bet that land-grant-driven upskilling and a single federal AI rulebook can outrun disruption.

A keynote-friendly ratio just hijacked the news—and your org chart—while the guardrails waited outside the room.

Huang recasts AI’s impact from layoffs to throughput, where backlogs surge, agents swarm, and the bottleneck shifts to you.

Meta’s rumored 20% cut isn’t automation at work—it’s payroll being traded for compute and scarce AI specialists.

Nvidia’s trillion-dollar outlook reads less like hype and more like a labor order for power, cooling, fiber—and the people to install them.

SXSW’s sharpest takeaway wasn’t a model drop but a mandate: bake worker agency, safety, and job quality into AI’s loss function—or watch automation quietly optimize people out.

Yesterday’s silence on AI and jobs was the tell: the disruption has slipped from headlines into HR portals, budgets, and Monday memos.

DOE just put Genesis on the clock—hands-on AI curricula now and a blueprint supercomputer by 2026—turning a research push into a hiring pipeline.

Atlassian just cut 1,600 roles, split the CTO job in two, and redirected hundreds of millions to an AI substrate aimed at enterprise buyers.

Congress just put a countdown on AI’s labor shock, ordering sector-by-sector forecasts and draft laws on training, UI, and taxes by April 2027.